How should investigators conduct interviews with victims and witnesses?

• A. In private, respectful, non-coercive interviews conducted by trained investigators, with thorough note-taking and record-keeping.
• B. In public settings to ensure transparency.
• C. With minimal documentation to protect privacy.
• D. Using coercive questioning to expedite results.

Answer: (A)

The main obligation is to conduct interviews in a private, respectful, and non-coercive way by trained investigators, with thorough note-taking and record-keeping. Private interviews create a safe environment where victims and witnesses can speak openly without fear of retaliation or judgment, which helps them share accurate details. A trauma-informed, non-coercive approach means investigators ask open, non-leading questions, listen carefully, and avoid pressure or intimidation, which protects the integrity of the information and reduces the risk of retraumatization. Thorough documentation—including detailed notes, dates, times, who was present, and what was said—ensures there is a reliable record for the investigation, supports accountability, and allows for proper review and corroboration of statements.

Public settings can compromise confidentiality and safety, making it harder for individuals to disclose what happened. Minimal documentation leaves the investigation with gaps and undermines credibility and the ability to follow up. Coercive questioning is harmful, unethical, and violates PREA standards, likely producing unreliable information and harming victims.